4.2 Review

Brain atrophy in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapy: a systematic review

Journal

ACTA RADIOLOGICA
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 257-266

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02841851211060427

Keywords

Brain atrophy; cerebral atrophy; acute ischemic stroke; cerebrovascular disease; reperfusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review suggests a potential prognostic role of brain atrophy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, due to heterogeneity in brain atrophy assessment and reporting, quantitative analysis is not feasible. Future studies using standardized assessment are needed to clarify the association between brain atrophy and clinical and safety outcomes in AIS.
Background Brain atrophy (BA) may have a role in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in mediating outcomes after reperfusion therapy. The extent of this association is not well understood. Purpose : To examine the impact of pre-existing BA on functional outcome, survival, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and early neurological change in patients with AIS treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Material and Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched for studies on BA in AIS receiving reperfusion therapy. Studies were included if: (i) patients were aged >= 18 years; (ii) patients had been diagnosed with AIS; (iii) patients received IVT and/or EVT; (iv) studies reported on BA; (v) studies reported on post-reperfusion outcomes; and (vi) studies had a sample size of >25 patients. Results A total of 4444 patients from eight studies were included. Four out of seven studies reporting on 90-day functional outcome found pre-existing BA to be significantly associated with poor functional outcome. Moreover, two out of four studies found BA to be a significant predictor of 90-day mortality. None of the included studies reported a significant association of BA with sICH or early neurological deterioration. Conclusion This systematic review indicates a potential prognostic role of BA in AIS. Quantitative analysis of association of BA with outcomes in AIS is not possible given the heterogeneity in BA assessment and reporting across studies. Future studies using standardized BA assessment are warranted to clarify its association with clinical and safety outcomes in AIS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available