4.7 Article

A comparison of theory and simulation with microgravity experiments on phase coarsening

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117402

Keywords

Ostwald ripening; CALPHAD; Phase-field modeling; Microstructures; Microgravity experiments

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX16AT64G]
  2. Florida Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative understanding of microstructure evolution during phase coarsening is crucial for materials optimization at high homologous temperatures. Using phase-field simulations, this study compared simulated microstructure features with experimental results from microgravity experiments, showing good agreement.
A quantitative understanding of microstructure evolution during phase coarsening is crucial to the optimization of processing, final structure, and properties of materials at high homologous temperatures. For example, microgravity experiments on phase coarsening in Pb-Sn solid-liquid mixtures allowed the kinetics of phase coarsening to be followed more closely and more accurately by eliminating sedimentation and convective melt flow. In this study we developed phase-field simulations to study microstructure evolution during solid-liquid phase coarsening. Physical properties for Pb-Sn solid-liquid mixtures were calculated using CALPHAD. Simulated microstructure features during phase coarsening are compared quantitatively with the microstructure evolution and kinetics extracted and archived from micro gravity experiments. In particular, experimental particle size distribution and coarsening rate constant are predicted from theory, and deduced from microgravity experiments, then calculated from phase-field simulations. The new results from phase field simulations agree with the results from archived micro gravity experiments for a lower volume fraction alloy, and still acceptably for Pb-Sn alloys with higher volume fraction. (c) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available