4.1 Article

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF ROCK RUPTURES acute accent SHEAR STRENGTH ANISOTROPY

Journal

ACTA GEODYNAMICA ET GEOMATERIALIA
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 111-117

Publisher

ACAD SCI CZECH REPUBLIC INST ROCK STRUCTURE & MECHANICS
DOI: 10.13168/AGG.2022.0001

Keywords

Shear strength; Anisotropy; Joints; Faults

Funding

  1. project 'Research team for radioactive waste disposal and nuclear safety' [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0052]
  2. project GACR [22-24206J]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Joints and fault surfaces significantly affect rock cohesion and exhibit anisotropy in shear strength. The study found that different types of ruptures have distinct patterns in shear strength distribution.
Joints significantly reduce rock cohesion compared to unfractured rock, but the question is what effect the possible anisotropy of the shear strength of different types of rupture has on possible subsequent failure. Both natural samples of granodiorite with natural joints and fault surfaces and gypsum models have been tested on the Matest A129 Rock shear box apparatus. The shear strength of preexisting ruptures was measured under a fixed normal stress component. The anisotropy of the shear strength of the joints and fault surfaces reached more than 60 % of maximum strength, which is a very important value for solving structural loads. The shear strength was analyzed with polar plots. The pattern of the real joints typically showed a teardrop shape with one peak of strength in a certain direction and a minimum in the opposite direction. On the contrary, striated fault surfaces are characterized by two axial directions of minimal shear strength, i.e., longitudinal and transverse, and by two axial oblique directions with maximal shear strength, so the strength distribution in the polar graph has a four-cornered shape. The study showed that the anisotropy of the shear strength of various types of ruptures is their important feature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available