4.5 Article

Characterization of Classical Flexural and Nummular Forms of Atopic Dermatitis in Childhood with Regard to Anamnestic, Clinical and Epidermal Barrier Aspects

Journal

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v101.979

Keywords

atopic dermatitis; nummular eczema; children; epidermal barrier

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nummular and classical atopic dermatitis have differences and similarities in children, including age of onset, localization, distribution, and morphology of the eczema. Keratosis pilaris is more severe in children with nummular atopic dermatitis. Both disease groups show reduced hydration, increased transepidermal water loss, and reduced intercellular lipid lamellae in lesional skin areas.
Nummular (coin-shaped) and classical (flexural) atopic dermatitis differ morphologically, but no other distinguishing features are known. The aim of this study was to determine differences and similarities of both variants in children. Detailed interviews, clinical examinations, biophysical measurements and electron microscopic analyses were performed on 10 children with nummular atopic dermatitis, 14 with classical atopic dermatitis and 10 healthy controls. Nummular atopic dermatitis affected more boys than girls and manifested less frequently within the first year of life than classical atopic dermatitis. Localization, distribution and morphology of the eczema varied more over time, and expression of keratosis pilaris was more severe in children with nummular atopic dermatitis. Both disease groups showed reduced hydration, increased transepidermal water loss and reduced intercellular lipid lamellae in lesional skin areas compared with non-lesional areas. These findings underline the separate classification of both variants. Further research is necessary to investigate the potential of diverging therapeutic approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available