4.5 Article

Age-related Differences in Tumour Characteristics and Prognostic Factors for Disease Progression in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Journal

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v101.347

Keywords

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; ageing; metastasis; recurrence; disease progression; elderly

Categories

Funding

  1. University Medical Center Groningen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guidelines for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck do not consider the age of the patient but assume equal tumor characteristics and prognosis for younger and elderly patients. This study compares tumor characteristics and identifies age-specific risk factors for disease progression in younger and elderly patients.
Guidelines for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck do not take the age of the patient into account, but instead assume equal tumour characteristics and prognostic factors for poor outcome in younger and elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare tumour characteristics of younger (< 75 years) and elderly (>= 75 years) patients and identify age-specific risk factors for progression of disease, comprising local recurrence, nodal metastasis and distant metastasis. Patient and tumour characteristics were compared using chi(2) or Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable competing risk analyses were performed to compare risk factors for progression of disease, incorporating the risk of dying before developing progression of disease. A total of 672 patients with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were retrospectively included. Larger tumour diameter, worse differentiation grade and deeper invasion were observed in older patients. In elderly patients, but not in younger patients, tumour diameter >= 40 mm, moderate differentiation grade and an invasion depth >= 2 mm were independent risk factors for progression of disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available