4.6 Article

The prevalence and significance of a short QT interval in 18 825 low-risk individuals including athletes

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 124-129

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094827

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CRY
  2. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-16-501] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The short QT syndrome is a cardiac channelopathy characterised by accelerated repolarisation which manifests as a short QT interval on the ECG. The definition of a short QT interval is debated, ranging from <390 to <= 320 ms, and its clinical significance in healthy young individuals is unknown. We assessed the prevalence and medium-term significance of an isolated short QT interval in a diverse young British population. Methods Between 2005 and 2013, 18 825 apparently healthy people aged 14-35 years underwent cardiovascular evaluation with history, physical examination and ECG. QT intervals were measured by cardiologists using 4 recommended guidelines (Seattle 2013, Heart Rhythm Society 2013, European Society of Cardiology 2010 and American Heart Association 2009). Results The prevalence of a short QT interval was 0.1% (26 patients, <= 320 ms), 0.2% (44 patients, <= 330 ms), 7.9% (1478 patients, <380 ms), 15.8% (2973 patients, <390 ms). Male gender and Afro-Caribbean ethnicity had the strongest association with short QT intervals. Athletes had shorter QT intervals than non-athletes but athletic status did not predict short QT intervals. Individuals with short QT intervals <= 320 ms did not report syncope or a sinister family history, and during a follow-up period of 5.3 +/- 1.2 years, there were no deaths in this group. Conclusions The prevalence of a short QT interval depends on the recommended cut-off value. Even at values <= 320 ms, there was an excellent medium-term prognosis among 14 people followed. We conclude that a definition of <= 320 ms is realistic to prevent overdiagnosis and excessive investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available