4.8 Article

High Indirect Energy Consumption in AEM-Based CO2 Electrolyzers Demonstrates the Potential of Bipolar Membranes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 557-563

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c16513

Keywords

bipolar membrane; anion exchange membrane; CO2 electrolysis; membrane electrode assembly; crossover; CO2 utilization

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [733.000.008]
  2. Shell Global Solutions International B.V.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AEM-based cells in CO2 electrolyzers have significant energy consumption due to CO2 crossover and electrolyte refining, while BPM-based cells, although stable with minimal CO2 loss, have lower Faradaic efficiency to CO, resulting in higher energy requirement per mol of CO. Improvement of the cathode-BPM interface is crucial for the future relevance of BPMs in CO2 electrolyzers.
Typically, anion exchange membranes (AEMs) are used in CO2 electrolyzers, but those suffer from unwanted CO2 crossover, implying (indirect) energy consumption for generating an excess of CO2 feed and purification of the KOH anolyte. As an alternative, bipolar membranes (BPMs) have been suggested, which mitigate the reactant loss by dissociating water albeit requiring a higher cell voltage when operating at a near-neutral pH. Here, we assess the direct and indirect energy consumption required to produce CO in a membrane electrode assembly with BPMs or AEMs. More than 2/3 of the energy consumption for AEM-based cells concerns CO2 crossover and electrolyte refining. While the BPM-based cell had a high stability and almost no CO2 loss, the Faradaic efficiency to CO was low, making the energy requirement per mol of CO higher than for the AEM-based cell. Improving the cathode-BPM interface should be the future focus to make BPMs relevant to CO2 electrolyzers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available