4.6 Article

The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience

Journal

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 664-668

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004441

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Otolaryngology Program Directors Organization
  2. councils of the Society of University Otolaryngologists
  3. Association of Academic Departments of Otolaryngology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the 2021 residency application cycle, a large number of otolaryngology applicants applied to more than half of the programs, increasing competition among applicants and making it difficult for programs to identify sincere interest. To address this issue, a preference signaling process was implemented, allowing applicants to indicate their interest in specific programs during the application submission. This process significantly increased the rate of interview offers from signaled programs compared to nonsignaled programs, and both applicants and program directors strongly favored continuing this program.
Problem In the 2021 residency application cycle, the average otolaryngology applicant applied to more than half of programs. Increasing application numbers make it difficult for applicants to stand out to programs of interest and for programs to identify applicants with sincere interest. Approach As part of the 2021 Match, otolaryngology applicants could participate in a preference signaling process, signaling up to 5 programs of particular interest at the time of application submission. Programs received a list of applicants who submitted signals to consider during interview offer deliberations. Applicants and program directors completed surveys to evaluate the signaling process and assess the impact of signals on interview offers. Outcomes All otolaryngology residency programs participated in the signaling process. In total, 611 students submitted applications for otolaryngology residency programs, 559 applicants submitted a Match list including an otolaryngology program, and 558 applicants participated in the signaling process. The survey response rate was 42% for applicants (n = 233) and 52% for program directors (n = 62). The rate of receiving an interview offer was significantly higher from signaled programs (58%) than from both nonsignaled programs (14%; P < .001) and the comparative nonsignal program (23%; P < .001) (i.e., the program an applicant would have signaled given a sixth signal). This impact was consistent across the spectrum of applicant competitiveness. Applicants (178, 77%) and program directors (53, 91%) strongly favored continuing the program. Next Steps Many specialties face high residency application numbers. Programs have difficulty identifying applicants with sincere interest, and applicants face limited opportunities to identify programs of particular interest. Applicants to these specialties may benefit from a preference signaling process like that in otolaryngology. Additional evaluation is needed to determine the impact of signals across racial and demographic lines and to validate these early outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available