4.5 Article

REcognizing DElirium in geriatric Emergency Medicine: The REDEEM risk stratification score

Journal

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 476-485

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14423

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kern Society Innovation Award, from the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) [UL1 TR002377]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study derived a risk score that can identify high-risk geriatric patients for delirium screening using variables available early in the emergency department encounter. The risk score includes variables from triage information and early history taking, and shows high sensitivity and specificity in detecting delirium in older adults. Validation of the REDEEM score is necessary before implementation for assisting delirium-targeted screening in high-risk geriatric patients in the ED.
Objective The objective was to derive a risk score that uses variables available early during the emergency department (ED) encounter to identify high-risk geriatric patients who may benefit from delirium screening. Methods This was an observational study of older adults age >= 75 years who presented to an academic ED and who were screened for delirium during their ED visit. Variable selection from candidate predictors was performed through a LASSO-penalized logistic regression. A risk score was derived from the final prediction model, and predictive accuracy characteristics were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results From the 967 eligible ED visits, delirium was detected in 107 (11.1%). The area under the curve for the REcognizing DElirium in Emergency Medicine (REDEEM) score was 0.901 (95% CI = 0.864-0.938). The REEDEM risk score included 10 different variables (seven based on triage information and three obtained during early history taking) with a score ranging from -3 to 66. Using an optimal cutoff of >= 11, we found a sensitivity of 84.1% (90 of 107 ED delirium patients, 95% CI = 75.5%-90.2%) and a specificity of 86.6% (745 of 860 non-ED delirium patients, 95% CI = 84.1%-88.8%). A lower cutoff of >= 5 was found to minimize false negatives with an improved sensitivity at 91.6% (98 of 107 ED delirium patients, 95% CI = 84.2%-95.8%). Conclusion A risk stratification score was derived with the potential to augment delirium recognition in geriatric ED patients. This has the potential to assist on delirium-targeted screening of high-risk patients in the ED. Validation of REDEEM, however, is needed prior to implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available