4.5 Article

Relationship between cooling time and neurological outcomes in targeted temperature management

Journal

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 729-735

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14440

Keywords

heart arrest; induced hypothermia; prognosis

Funding

  1. Korean Hypothermia Network investigators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the relationship between cooling time and neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between cooling time and neurological outcomes at 6 months.
Objectives The relationship between cooling time (CT) variables and neurological outcomes is controversial. We evaluated the relationship between CT and neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM). Methods We conducted a multicenter, prospective, and registry-based study of OHCA survivors treated with TTM. CT was defined as the time from restoration of spontaneous circulation to achievement of the target temperature. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome at 6 months. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to test the relationship between CT and the primary outcome. Results Overall, the favorable neurological outcome rates at 6 months were 29.8% in 937 patients. When CT was stratified into categories of 0-3, 3.1-6, 6.1-9, 9.1-12, and >12 h, according to 3-h intervals, the primary outcome rates were 8.2%, 22.7%, 35.5%, 44.7%, and 44.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Significant differences were not found in multilevel logistic regression analysis; the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of each category for the primary outcome compared to the 0-3-h group were 0.81 (0.32 to 2.04), 0.77 (0.30 to 2.01), 1.26 (0.43 to 3.68), and 1.06 (0.37 to 3.06). Conclusions We did not find a relationship between CT and neurological outcomes at 6 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available