4.5 Article

Influence of the central-to-peripheral arterial stiffness gradient on the timing and amplitude of wave reflections

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 723-729

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hr.2016.64

Keywords

arterial stiffness gradient; augmentation index; central pulse pressure; pulse wave velocity; wave reflection

Funding

  1. Cambridge Commonwealth Trust
  2. Cambridge Overseas Trust
  3. British Heart Foundation Senior Clinical Fellowship
  4. British Heart Foundation
  5. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  6. British Heart Foundation [FS/07/001/21990, FS/12/8/29377] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0515-10093] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In individuals with compliant aortas, peripheral muscular artery stiffness exceeds central elastic artery stiffness. With aging, central stiffness increases with little change in peripheral stiffness, resulting in a reversal of the normal stiffness gradient. This reversal may reduce the wave reflection amplitude due to the movement of the major 'effective' reflection site further from the heart. To test this phenomenon, we investigated the relationship among arterial stiffness gradients (normal and reversed), wave reflection amplitude and reflection site distance. Subjects aged >= 50 years were recruited from the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial. Central stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). In Study 1, peripheral PWV was also measured in the arm (carotid-radial pulse wave velocity) and, in Study 2, in the leg (femoral-dorsalis pedis). Reflection site distance was calculated from cfPWV and the reflected wave Tr. Subjects were dichotomized into those with a normal stiffness gradient (peripheral >central PWV) or a reversed gradient (peripheral

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available