4.6 Article

Habitat structure shaping megabenthic communities inhabiting subtidal soft bottoms along the Algarve coast (Portugal)

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 784, Issue 1, Pages 249-264

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-2879-3

Keywords

Subtidal megabenthic communities; Spatial scale; Alpha diversity; Community composition; Coastal zone

Funding

  1. IPMA, within the EU project SAFI [FP7-SPACE-2013-1, 607155]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT - Portugal) [SFRH/BPD/26348/2006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study analysed the megabenthic diversity in subtidal soft bottoms and assessed the main environmental drivers of megabenthic community organisation along the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). We tested the hypothesis that megabenthic communities respond to the same environmental drivers than macrofauna. We found that similar to macrofauna, megafaunal communities were organised in relation to the depth of closure, light reaching the bottom, and the hydrodynamic conditions related with exposure within the shallower areas. The influence of the main river outflow prevailed over other drivers, but only up to 9 m depth. We found that seven different spatial units should be considered, each characterised by different indicator species. Additionally, among a total of 412 taxa collected between 4 and 50 m depth, we provide the characteristics of the 64 commonest species in terms of occurrence, frequency, distribution, abundance, bathymetric and sedimentary preferences, which constitutes most valuable information for ecosystem modelling. Megabenthic alpha diversity decreased with depth, contrary to evenness and was higher in the proximity of the river Guadiana and in highly exposed shores. We conclude that the megafauna, which is significantly quicker to collect and analyse, can provide an accurate alternative to macrofauna sampling, as their communities are shaped by the same drivers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available