Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology
Kirstine Kirkegaard et al.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2015)
Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study
Ashleigh Storr et al.
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS (2015)
Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer
A. Ahlstrom et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2011)
Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study
Goedele Paternot et al.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011)
Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos
Goedele Paternot et al.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009)
Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading
Allison E. Baxter Bendus et al.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2006)
Prediction of embryo developmental potential and pregnancy based on early stage morphological characteristics
Peter Sjoblom et al.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2006)
Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments
Joan-Carles Arce et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2006)
A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer
I Van der Auwera et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2002)
The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos
JD Fisch et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2001)
Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer
DK Gardner et al.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2000)
Share Paper
