4.6 Article

Violent and non-violent crime against adults with severe mental illness

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 206, Issue 4, Pages 275-282

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147843

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) Population Health Sciences Fellowship [G0802432/1]
  2. Big Lottery [C247A1198]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR-RP-R3-12-011]
  4. NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  5. King's College London
  6. Medical Research Council [G0802434] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-RP-R3-12-011] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0802434] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Little is known about the relative extent of crime against people with severe mental illness (SMI). Aims To assess the prevalence and impact of crime among people with SMI compared with the general population. Method A total of 361 psychiatric patients were interviewed using the national crime survey questionnaire, and findings compared with those from 3138 general population controls participating in the contemporaneous. national crime survey. Results Past-year crime was experienced by 40% of patients v. 14% of controls (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.8, 95% Cl 2.0-3.8); and violent assaults by 19% of patients V. 3% of controls (adjusted OR=5.3, 95% Cl 3.1-8.8). Women with SMI had four-, ten- and four-fold increases in the odds of experiencing domestic, community and sexual violence, respectively. Victims with SMI were more likely to report psychosocial morbidity following violence than victims from the general population. Conclusions People with SMI are at greatly increased risk of crime and associated morbidity. violence prevention policies should be particularly focused on people with SMI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available