4.1 Review

An assessment of methane gas production from natural gas hydrates: Challenges, technology and market outlook

Journal

ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 318-332

Publisher

Yandy Scientific Press
DOI: 10.46690/ager.2021.03.07

Keywords

Natural gas hydrates; methane; permafrost; clathrate; depressurization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural gas hydrates are a vast energy resource found in permafrost and deep ocean sediments, but commercial production remains a challenge due to technical, environmental, and economic factors, including competition from cheap gas sources. Depressurization method is considered the most feasible option for extracting methane gas from hydrate deposits.
Natural gas hydrates are enormous energy resources occurring in the permafrost and under deep ocean sediments. However, the commercial or sustained production of this resource with currently available technology remains a technical, environmental, and economic challenge, albeit a few production tests have been conducted to date. One of the major challenges has been sand production due to the unconsolidated nature of hydrate bearing formations. This review presents progress in methane gas production from natural gas hydrate deposits, specifically addressing the technology, field production and simulation tests, challenges, and the market outlook. Amongst the production techniques, the depressurization method of dissociating natural gas hydrates is widely accepted as the most feasible option and it has been used the most in field test trials and simulation studies. The market for natural gas hydrates looks promising considering the increasing demand for energy globally, limited availability of conventional fossil fuels, and the low carbon footprint when using natural gas compared to liquid and solid fossil fuels. The major market setback currently is cheap gas from shale and conventional oil and gas reservoirs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available