4.2 Article

Walking impairs cognitive performance among people with multiple sclerosis but not controls

Journal

HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 124-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.06.010

Keywords

Neurodegenerative disease; Cognitive motor interference; Cognition; Gait; Rehabilitation; Dual-task ability

Funding

  1. MS Society of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs program
  3. Research and Development Corporation, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) complain of problems completing two tasks simultaneously; sometimes called 'dual-tasking' (DT). Previous research in DT among people with MS has focused on how adding a cognitive task interferes with gait and few have measured how adding a motor task could interfere with cognition. We aimed to determine the extent to which walking affects a concurrent working memory task in people with MS compared to healthy controls. We recruited MS participants (n = 13) and controls (n = 10) matched by age ( 3 years), education ( 3 years) and gender. Participants first completed the cognitive task (subtracting 7's from the previous number) and then again while walking on an instrumented walkway. Although there were no baseline differences in cognition or walking between MS participants and controls, MS participants demonstrated a 52% decrease in number of correct answers during DT (p < 0.001). Mental Tracking Rate (% correct answers/min) correlated strongly with MS-related disability measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; r(11)= -0.68, p < 0.01). We propose that compromised mental tracking during walking could be related to limited neural resource capacity and could be a potentially useful outcome measure to detect ecologically valid dual tasking impairments. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available