4.5 Article

Ciliopathy-associated protein CEP290 modifies the severity of retinal degeneration due to loss of RPGR

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 2005-2012

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw075

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [EY022372, EY08123, EY019298, EY014800-039003]
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  3. University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (UMCCTS)
  4. Massachusetts Lions Eye Research Funds
  5. RPB Nelson Trust Award
  6. Retina Research Foundation (Alice McPherson, MD), Houston

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in RPGR (retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator) are the most common cause of X-linked RP, a severe blindness disorder. RPGR mutations result in clinically variable disease with early- to late-onset phenotypic presentation. Molecular mechanisms underlying such heterogeneity are unclear. Here we show that phenotypic expression of Rpgr-loss in mice is influenced genetically by the loss of Cep290, a human ciliopathy gene. We found that Rpgr(ko/Y) mice with a heterozygous hypomorphic allele of Cep290 (Cep290(rd16/+)) but not of a heterozygous null allele of Cep290 (Cep290(null/+)) or of other ciliopathy genes, Rpgrip1, Nphp1, Nphp4 and Nphp5, exhibit relatively early onset (by 3 months of age) retinal degeneration and dysfunction when compared with the onset at similar to 7 months of age in the Rpgr(ko/Y) mice. We also observed disorganized photoreceptor outer-segment morphology and defective trafficking of opsins in the Rpgr(ko/Y)::Cep290(rd16/+) mice. Together with a physical interaction between RPGR and the C-terminal domain of CEP290, our data suggest that RPGR and CEP290 genetically interact and highlight the involvement of hypomorphic alleles of genes as potential modifiers of heterogeneous retinal ciliopathies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available