4.5 Article

IFT52 mutations destabilize anterograde complex assembly, disrupt ciliogenesis and result in short rib polydactyly syndrome

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages 4012-4020

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw241

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 DE01957, R01 AR062651, RO1 AR066124]
  2. NIH [T32 HG002536]
  3. National Human Genome Research Institute
  4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [1U54 HG006493]
  5. Joseph Drown Foundation
  6. NIH-NCRR shared resources grant [CJX1-443835-WS-29646]
  7. NSF Major Research Instrumentation grant [CHE-0722519]
  8. NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI [UL1TR000124]
  9. March of Dimes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The short-rib polydactyly syndromes (SRPS) encompass a radiographically and genetically heterogeneous group of skeletal ciliopathies that are characterized by a long narrow chest, short extremities, and variable occurrence of polydactyly. Radiographic abnormalities include undermineralization of the calvarium, shortened and bowed appendicular bones, trident shaped acetabula and polydactyly. In a case of SRPS we identified compound heterozygosity for mutations in IFT52, which encodes a component of the anterograde intraflagellar transport complex. The IFT52 mutant cells synthesized a significantly reduced amount of IFT52 protein, leading to reduced synthesis of IFT74, IFT81, IFT88 and ARL13B, other key anterograde complex members. Ciliogenesis was also disrupted in the mutant cells, with a 60% reduction in the presence of cilia on mutant cells and loss of cilia length regulation for the cells with cilia. These data demonstrate that IFT52 is essential for anterograde complex integrity and for the biosynthesis and maintenance of cilia. The data identify a new locus for SRPS and show that IFT52 mutations result in a ciliopathy with primary effects on the skeleton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available