4.7 Article

General and specialized brain correlates for analogical reasoning: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1953-1969

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23149

Keywords

analogy; reasoning; rostral prefrontal; abstraction; relational reasoning; functional MRI; neural correlates; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-RPDOC-004-01]
  2. Societe Francaise de Neurologie
  3. Journees de Neurologie de Langue Francaise
  4. Investissements d'avenir program [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]
  5. Fondation pour la recherche medicale [FDM 20150632801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reasoning by analogy allows us to link distinct domains of knowledge and to transfer solutions from one domain to another. Analogical reasoning has been studied using various tasks that have generally required the consideration of the relationships between objects and their integration to infer an analogy schema. However, these tasks varied in terms of the level and the nature of the relationships to consider (e.g., semantic, visuospatial). The aim of this study was to identify the cerebral network involved in analogical reasoning and its specialization based on the domains of information and task specificity. We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 27 experiments that used analogical reasoning tasks. The left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex was one of the regions most consistently activated across the studies. A comparison between semantic and visuospatial analogy tasks showed both domain-oriented regions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri and a domain-general region, the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, which was specialized for analogy tasks. A comparison of visuospatial analogy to matrix problem tasks revealed that these two relational reasoning tasks engage, at least in part, distinct right and left cerebral networks, particularly separate areas within the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. These findings highlight several cognitive and cerebral differences between relational reasoning tasks that can allow us to make predictions about the respective roles of distinct brain regions or networks. These results also provide new, testable anatomical hypotheses about reasoning disorders that are induced by brain damage. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1953-1969, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available