4.5 Article

Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficient for polychlorinated naphthalenes through three-dimensional QSAR models

Journal

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 40-55

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2016.1219650

Keywords

3D-QSAR; biological enrichment; K-ow; molecule modification; PCNs

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JB2013146]
  2. Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program in the Eleventh Five-Year Plan Period [2008BAC43B01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on experimental data for the octanol-water partition coefficient (K-ow) of 21 polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) congeners, two types of three-dimensional QSAR (3D-QSAR) models comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) were established with Sybyl software. This was established to predict the K-ow values of 54 additional PCN congeners and carry out a modification of CN-73 to lower its K-ow significantly, simultaneously maintaining the stability and insulativity of CN-73. The contour maps of two models showed that the electrostatic field plays a dominating role in the logK(ow) values of PCNs, and the bioconcentration of PCN decreased when -Cl atoms on the 1-, 3-, 4-, 6-, and 7-positions of PCNs were replaced with electropositive groups. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between the number of -Cl atoms on PCNs and the average logK(ow) values of PCNs. After modification of CN-73 through the electrostatic contour maps, six types of new modified CN-73 compounds were obtained with logK(ow) values two orders of magnitude lower than that of CN-73. Meanwhile, there was not a significant difference observed between the calculated total energy (representing stability) and energy gap (representing insulativity) of the new modified compounds when compared with those of CN-73.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available