4.4 Article

Everyday discrimination and diurnal cortisol during adolescence

Journal

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 76-81

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.01.009

Keywords

Everyday discrimination; Adolescents; HPA activity; Cortisol; Ethnicity

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01-HD062547]
  2. UCLA California Center for Population Research
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R24-HD04102r2]
  4. UCLA Older Americans Independence Center
  5. National Institute of Aging [P30-AG028748]
  6. NIH Research Infrastructure in Minority Institutions from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities [P20 MD003938]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To examine the associations of the frequency and type of everyday discrimination with diurnal cortisol and whether those associations depend upon adolescents' ethnicity and gender. Methods: Adolescents (N = 292, M-age = 16.39 years, SD = 0.74; 58% female) reported the frequency of perceived everyday discrimination and whether they attributed that discrimination to race, gender, age, or height and weight. Five saliva samples were collected per day across 3 days and assayed for cortisol. Results: Higher frequency of everyday discrimination was associated with greater total daily cortisol output (area under the curve; AUC), lower wake and bedtime levels of cortisol, and less of a decline in cortisol across the day. These associations generally did not depend upon ethnicity or gender and attributions for the discrimination were not as consequential as the actual frequency of any type of unfair treatment. Conclusion: Everyday discrimination, regardless of its type, may contribute to heightened HPA activity among adolescents of different ethnic backgrounds and genders. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available