3.8 Article

What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities?

Journal

GEOSCAPE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 90-103

Publisher

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/geosc-2021-0008

Keywords

Geoparticipation; Local governance; Democratic innovations

Categories

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [19-14506S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluates the state of geoparticipation among Czech municipalities using the Index of geoparticipation, revealing disparities in the use of geoparticipatory tools. It was found that member municipalities of the Healthy Cities network utilize geoparticipatory tools more frequently than others, indicating potential for improvement in geoparticipation practices among Czech municipalities.
The active involvement of citizens in decision-making processes via geoparticipatory spatial tools is becoming a popular research field among geographers, GIScientists, environmental psychologists, political scientists and many others. This paper presents the idea of the Index of geoparticipation - an indicator-based index divided into three dimensions (communication, participation, transparency) that helps to evaluate the state of geoparticipation among Czech municipalities. It describes the current state of geoparticipation at the municipality level in Czechia. It aims to fill the research gap in finding which components of geoparticipation at the municipality level are being used, and how their use is affected by the size of municipalities and their membership of Local Agenda 21 networks. The paper builds upon an extensive dataset collected by the authors from all Czech municipalities (n=6 258) and presents various shades of geoparticipation in Czechia. Highlights for public administration, management and planning: The highest average values of the Index of geoparticipation were obtained from the regions' capital cities, followed by statutory cities, municipalities with extended powers, municipalities which are members of the Healthy Cities of the Czech Republic (HCCZ) network and cities. HCCZ member municipalities use geoparticipatory tools significantly more than the rest of the Czech municipalities The communication dimension is the most widely implemented pillar of the Index of geoparticipation There is no significant relationship between social exclusion and geoparticipation at the nationwide level

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available