3.8 Article

Evaluation of Melanocyte Loss in Mycosis Fungoides Using SOX10 Immunohistochemistry

Journal

DERMATOPATHOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 277-284

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/dermatopathology8030034

Keywords

mycosis fungoides; hypopigmented mycosis fungoides; SOX10; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a subtype of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with indolent course. A study assessed melanocyte loss in MF through immunohistochemistry, finding a decrease or focal loss of melanocytes in 50% of cases. Factors such as predominant neoplastic cell type, age, race, gender, and histologic features were not predictive of melanocyte loss.
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a subtype of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with an indolent course that rarely progresses. Histologically, the lesions display a superficial lymphocytic infiltrate with epidermotropism of neoplastic T-cells. Hypopigmented MF is a rare variant that presents with hypopigmented lesions and is more likely to affect young patients. The etiology of the hypopigmentation is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess melanocyte loss in MF through immunohistochemistry (IHC) with SOX10. Twenty cases were evaluated, including seven of the hypopigmented subtype. The neoplastic epidermotropic infiltrate consisted predominantly of CD4+ T-cells in 65% of cases; CD8+ T-cells were present in moderate to abundant numbers in most cases. SOX10 IHC showed a decrease or focal complete loss of melanocytes in 50% of the cases. The predominant neoplastic cell type (CD4+/CD8+), age, race, gender, histologic features, and reported clinical pigmentation of the lesions were not predictive of melanocyte loss. A significant loss of melanocytes was observed in 43% of hypopigmented cases and 54% of conventional cases. Additional studies will increase our understanding of the relationship between observed pigmentation and the loss of melanocytes in MF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available