3.8 Article

Technical-biological bank protection measures - Design concept for the engineering practice

Journal

GEOTECHNIK
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 178-190

Publisher

ERNST & SOHN
DOI: 10.1002/gete.202000039

Keywords

technical-biological bank protection measures; design concept; inland waterways; excess pore water pressure; erosion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to improve the ecological conditions of inland waterways, extensive bank redesigns are planned in the next few years, with more natural bank protection measures using plants to replace existing rip rap. Through a large-scale nature experiment on the River Rhine near Worms, a design concept has been developed and integrated into software, allowing bank protection to be dimensioned with plants in addition to riprap. This concept takes into account experience from small rivers without shipping and various research results.
To improve the ecological condition of inland waterways, extensive bank redesigns are planned over the next few years. More natural bank protection measures using plants are to replace the existing rip rap where possible to create more habitats for plants and animals and more structural diversity. So far, relatively little experience has been gained with technical-biological bank protection measures on waterways with the current shipping impacts. On the basis of various research results and experience from a large-scale nature experiment on the river Rhine near Worms, a first design concept for the engineering practice of the waterway and shipping administration was developed, taking into account the experience on small rivers without shipping. The concept was also integrated into a software. This means that bank protection with plants can now be dimensioned in addition to riprap revetments. The special features of living building materials, the hydraulic effects, the geotechnical failure mechanisms to be investigated and the individual design steps are presented below.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available