4.6 Article

Prednisolone plus S-adenosil-L-methionine in severe alcoholic hepatitis

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 983-987

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-016-9751-4

Keywords

Alcoholic hepatitis; Prednisolone; SAMe; Hepatorenal syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a life-threatening liver disease with a potential of 30-40 % mortality at 1 month. While steroids remain to be a first line therapy, they provide only about 50 % survival benefit. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of glucocorticoids plus S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), as compared to glucocorticoids alone, in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis. Forty patients with severe AH were randomized in two groups and enrolled in the prospective trial. Group 1 (n = 20) patients received prednisolone 40 mg/daily per os, and group 2 (n = 20) patients were managed with prednisolone 40 mg/daily per os plus SAMe 800 mg i.v. treatment. Duration was 28 days. The response rate assessed by Lille model was significantly higher in the prednisolone plus SAMe group (19 of 20; 95 %) than in the prednisolone group (13 of 20; 65 %), p = 0.044. Two (10 %) patients died, both from the prednisolone group. There were no lethal outcomes in the prednisolone plus SAMe group. The Kaplan-Meier method showed no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.151, log-rank). Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) occurred in 20 % in the prednisolone group (4 of 20 patients) while no HRS cases were registered in the prednisolone plus SAMe group (p = 0.035). Management of severe alcoholic hepatitis with prednisolone plus SAMe was associated with better therapy response (p = 0.044) and less frequent HRS occurrence (p = 0.035). Mortality was not significantly lower in the prednisolone-SAMe group than in the prednisolone-only group at 28 days (10 vs. 0 %, p = 0.151).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available