3.8 Article

Identifying Researchers' Publication Strategies by Clustering Publication and Impact Data

Journal

PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 347-363

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12109-021-09832-7

Keywords

Researcher publication strategies; Productivity; Collaboration; Impact indicators; Panel data regression; Cluster analysis

Funding

  1. CONACYT
  2. Tecnologico de Monterrey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying strategies for researchers has been investigated from different perspectives, such as choosing research topics or the effect of partner selection. This study aims to identify publication strategies through behavioral observations for researchers belonging to the engineering area, and has identified low-impact and high-impact publication strategies used by Mexican researchers.
Identifying strategies for researchers has been a problem investigated from different perspectives, such as choosing research topics or the effect of partner selection. Its importance lies in the effect these choices have in the long term and the importance of taking them into account at the beginning of the scientific career. This study aims to identify publication strategies through behavioral observations for researchers belonging to the engineering area. We analyzed 3,156 researchers affiliated to Mexican National Researchers System with publication data from 2007 to 2016. Publication strategies are defined as a combination of two-year productivity and collaboration indicators, and their success is reflected in terms of citations received in a three-year time window. Using clustering techniques, we identified differentiated patterns aligned with a given citation level. As a result of our case study, we identified low-impact and high-impact publication strategies used by Mexican researchers, which in turn can be used for designing long-term strategies for researchers. Our methodology can be used to discover publication strategies in other areas and geographical regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available