3.8 Article

Response surface analysis of nozzle parameters at supersonic flow through microjets

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 1037-1052

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14484846.2021.1938954

Keywords

Design of experiments; high-speed flows; CD nozzle; base pressure; RSM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper experimentally tests the microjets impact as a control mechanism in high-speed aerodynamic flow and evaluates the key parameters influencing the flow. The results indicate that the L/D ratio has the most significant impact on the base pressure among the considered parameters.
Base pressure is a crucial component in the measurement of flow parameters in a high-speed aerodynamic flow. In this paper, the microjets impact as a control mechanism is experimentally tested for the nozzles with abrupt expansion at supersonic Mach in an axisymmetric conduit. The flow regulation mechanism is placed at a 90-degree interval in the shape of an orifice of 0.5 mm in radius along the nozzle's exit diameter, which generates jets at sonic Mach numbers. The flow constraints studied are inertia level (Mach number), expansion level (NPR), and the geometric parameters considered are the pipe's length (L/D). These three relevant parameters were selected for design of experiments (DOE). In the management of base pressure, this analysis's primary objective is to evaluate the parameters influencing the flow. The experiments were carried out in two ways: without and with microjets. For the DOE, an L-27 orthogonal series, polynomial expression, analysis of variance, and predicted plots were carried out to test the experimental findings. The established prototypes are statistically appropriate and achieved when making precise projections for all the cases. According to the present results, the L/D ratio for a given parameter is the most critical parameter influencing the maximum increase or decrease in the base pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available