4.2 Article

Why do growth mindsets make you feel better about learning and your selves? The mediating role of adaptability

Journal

INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 249-264

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2021.1962888

Keywords

Language mindsets; adaptability; self-efficacy; self-concept; enjoyment; anxiety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that growth mindsets are crucial for cultivating positive emotions and self-development by enhancing adaptability, leading to increased enjoyment, self-concept, and self-efficacy in language learners. On the other hand, fixed mindsets may result in decreased anxiety, self-concept, and self-efficacy, highlighting the significance of growth mindsets in foreign language education.
We argue that growth (vs. fixed) mindsets are important for positive emotions and self-development because growth mindsets can foster adaptability, referring to the ability to adjust oneself in different circumstances. This study examines the role of mindsets in adaptability and whether adaptability, in turn, predicts learning emotions (anxiety and enjoyment), self-concept, and self-efficacy. The data were collected through self-report questionnaires from 211 (141 females and 70 males, M-age= 17.2 years, SDage= 6.8) Iranian intermediate language learners. The path analysis results showed that fixed mindsets negatively predicted anxiety, enjoyment, self-concept, and self-efficacy through the mediation of adaptability, whereas growth mindsets positively predicted enjoyment, self-concept, and self-efficacy and negatively predicted anxiety through adaptability. The results held even after accounting for ideal L2 self and perceived competence. These findings highlight that growth mindset is an essential factor for developing positive learning emotions and self in foreign language classrooms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available