3.8 Article

Erenumab Discontinuation After 12-Month Treatment A Multicentric, Observational Real-Life Study

Journal

NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages E834-E839

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001112

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After discontinuation of erenumab treatment, there was a rapid worsening of migraine symptoms, despite clinical improvement observed during retreatment. It may be necessary to reconsider the timing of treatment discontinuation due to the high frequency and degree of worsening seen during discontinuation.
Objective To assess migraine outcome after 12-month treatment with erenumab and compare patients who underwent 3-month erenumab discontinuation following the first treatment cycle with those who continued monthly administrations. Methods This is a multicentric observational study in patients with migraine in treatment with erenumab. After a full 12-month treatment cycle (T-12), patients could either continue or discontinue erenumab for at least 3 months. Patients who underwent treatment discontinuation were assessed after 3 months (T-15) to decide whether to start retreatment. Patients were then assessed following at T-16 and T-18. Results Thirty consecutive patients were enrolled. Nineteen patients underwent treatment suspension at T-12 up to T-15, whereas 11 continued prophylaxis. At T-15, patients who discontinued treatment documented significantly more migraine days (17.06 +/- 6.5 vs 4.8 +/- 2.5; p < 0.0001) and analgesics consumption (14.8 +/- 9.2 vs 4.6 +/- 2.5; p = 0.002), compared with those who continued treatment. After retreatment, at T-16, patients who had previously undergone discontinuation documented a significant improvement in terms of migraine days (9.01 +/- 4.4 vs 17.06 +/- 6.5; p < 0.0001) and analgesics consumption (9.6 +/- 7.3 vs 14.8 +/- 9.2; p = 0.004). Such improvement was even greater at T-18, comparable with T-12. Conclusion After treatment discontinuation, a rapid migraine worsening was found, despite the high clinical response during treatment and at retreatment, which might be secondary to an untimely interruption of a potentially disease-modifying pharmacologic intervention. Although clinical improvement was documented after retreatment, given the high frequency and degree of worsening during discontinuation, it seems plausible-even ethical-to re-evaluate current timing of discontinuation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available