3.8 Review

Current recommendations on the role of diet in the aetiology and management of IBD

Journal

FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 160-167

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101429

Keywords

inflammatory bowel disease; diet; dietary fibre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diet plays a crucial role in the development and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, but there is currently limited evidence and uncertainty in providing specific dietary recommendations for its management. Until high-quality clinical research becomes available, the only safe suggestion is a healthy diet that applies to the general population for overall health and well-being.
Diet is a key modifier of risk of inflammatory bowel disease development and potentially a treatment option in patients with established disease. International organisations in gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease have published guidelines for the role of diet in disease onset and its management. Here, we discuss the major overarching themes arising from these guidelines and appraise recent literature on the role of diet for inflammatory bowel disease prevention, treatment of active disease and maintenance of remission, considering these themes. Except for exclusive enteral nutrition in active Crohn's disease, we currently possess very little evidence to make any further dietary recommendations for the management of inflammatory bowel disease. There is also currently uncertainty on the extrapolation of epidemiological dietary signals on risk of disease development and preclinical experiments in animal models to management, once disease is established. Until high-quality evidence from clinical research becomes available, the only specific recommendations for inflammatory bowel disease we might safely give are those of healthy eating which apply for the general population for overall health and well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available