4.2 Article

Reflections on the (Post-)Human Condition: Towards New Forms of Engagement with the World?

Journal

SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 63-94

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2021.1893859

Keywords

Critical posthumanities; post-anthropocentrism; posthuman condition; posthumanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the rise of the 'posthuman condition' over the past decades by analyzing concepts such as posthumanism, post-anthropocentrism, and critical posthumanities. It evaluates the extent to which these concepts challenge traditional humanist assumptions and advocate for more diverse and symbiotic relationships in society.
The main purpose of this paper is to examine the validity of the contention that, over the past decades, we have been witnessing the rise of the 'posthuman condition'. To this end, the analysis draws on the work of the contemporary philosopher Rosi Braidotti. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part centres on the concept of posthumanism, suggesting that it reflects a systematic attempt to challenge humanist assumptions underlying the construction of 'the human'. The second part focuses on the concept of post-anthropocentrism, demonstrating that it articulates a desire to reject the twin ideas of 'species supremacism' and 'human exceptionalism', which it seeks to replace with 'species egalitarianism' and 'monistic vitalism'. The third part is concerned with the concept of critical posthumanities, positing that its advocacy is based on the cross-fertilization of posthumanism and post-anthropocentrism. The fourth part offers an assessment of the 'posthuman condition' thesis, evaluating the extent to which it sheds new light on the ways in which our engagements with the world are shaped by the confluence of zoe-, geo-, and techno-based dimensions. The paper concludes with a brief summary of the key insights gained from the preceding inquiry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available