3.8 Article

Equitably Linking Integrative Learning and Students' Innovation Capacities

Journal

INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 1-21

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-021-09570-w

Keywords

Integrative learning; Innovation; College students; SEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the relationship between integrative learning and undergraduate innovation in postsecondary education. Through a sample of 5,503 undergraduate students from four universities in the United States, a robust association between integrative learning and innovation intentions was found. The study also identified major-specific and identity-based patterns affecting innovation in relation to integrative learning.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between two recent currents in postsecondary education - integrative learning and undergraduate innovation. We located the rationale for this study in postsecondary educational practices and policies (e.g., inclusive makerspaces, transdisciplinary courses) which have theorized the connection between these two areas yet have not scrutinized this relationship through robust quantitative study. Drawing on a sample of 5,503 undergraduate students attending one of four Universities in the United States, we employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the uniqueness of measured constructs as well as examined associations between variables and overall fit in a structural setting. Results indicated the appropriateness of measuring each construct distinctively and provided evidence of a robust relationship between integrative learning and innovation intentions. Additionally, we identified consistent major-specific and identity-based patterns of realizing effects on innovation in association with integrative learning. The study concludes with discussion of findings and implications for educators and academic leaders working to equitably support efforts across these areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available