3.9 Article

Generation and verification of 27-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states in a superconducting quantum computer

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2399-6528/ac1df7

Keywords

quantum computing; quantum information; entanglement

Funding

  1. University of Melbourne
  2. Laby Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By utilizing quantum readout error mitigation and parity verification error detection on the IBM Quantum ibmq_montreal device, a fidelity of 0.546 for a 27-qubit GHZ state was recorded with a confidence level of 98.6% demonstrating genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) across the full device. The effect of parity verification on GHZ fidelity, although relatively modest, led to a detectable improvement in the fidelity of GHZ states.
Generating and detecting genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) of sizeable quantum states prepared on physical devices is an important benchmark for highlighting the progress of near-term quantum computers. A common approach to certify GME is to prepare a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state and measure a GHZ fidelity of at least 0.5. We measure the fidelities using multiple quantum coherences of GHZ states on 11 to 27 qubits prepared on the IBM Quantum ibmq_montreal device. Combinations of quantum readout error mitigation (QREM) and parity verification error detection are applied to the states. A fidelity of 0.546 +/- 0.017 was recorded for a 27-qubit GHZ state when QREM was used, demonstrating GME across the full device with a confidence level of 98.6%. We benchmarked the effect of parity verification on GHZ fidelity for two GHZ state preparation embeddings on the heavy-hexagon architecture. The results show that the effect of parity verification, while relatively modest, led to a detectable improvement of GHZ fidelity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available