4.3 Article

The labour of place: Memory and extended reality (XR) in migration museums

Journal

MEMORY STUDIES
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 606-621

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/17506980211010697

Keywords

extended reality (XR); labour; migration; museums; place; practice-based research

Funding

  1. King's College London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of Extended Reality (XR) migration museum exhibitions, this study explores how memory and place interact, with XR places in Web 2.0 representing a multiplication of memory's significant localities, including the beginning, production, and consumption of migration memory. The digital frictions involved in mnemonic labor at these sites contribute to a complex form of multiple place-making with intricate feelings and meanings. This innovative approach to understanding and curating XR experiences in museums emphasizes the significance of labor in creating meaningful places.
How do we understand the relationship between memory and place in the context of Extended Reality (XR) migration museum exhibitions? The study combines a global mapping of XR within migration museums, a user analysis of Cologne's virtual migration museum, and practice-led research with the UK Migration Museum to argue that XR places in Web 2.0 constitute a multiplication of memory's significant localities. These include a migration memory's place of beginning (the location of a migrant experience), the place of production (where the memory is transformed into representation) and the place of consumption (where the mediated memory is engaged with, looked at, heard). Mnemonic labour involving digital frictions at each of these sites constitutes a form of multiple place-making with complex feelings, meanings, and (dis)connections. This points to an innovative approach to understanding and curating XR experiences with museums that recognises the significance of the labour of place.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available