4.5 Article

A qualitative secondary data analysis of intentional and unintentional medication nonadherence in adults with chronic heart failure

Journal

HEART & LUNG
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 468-474

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.08.003

Keywords

Medication adherence; Self-care; Common sense model; Heart failure; Qualitative symptoms

Funding

  1. SIGMA Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
  2. NIOSH Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health [T42OH0087428-02]
  3. Kynett Foundation
  4. University of Pennsylvania Institute on Aging
  5. New York University Provost University Challenge Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore factors contributing to intentional and unintentional medication nonadherence in adults with chronic heart failure (HF). Background: Medication nonadherence is prevalent in HF but the factors contributing to it are not well understood. Methods: This secondary data analysis of qualitative data explored narrative accounts about medication adherence from four previous studies (N = 112). The Necessity Concerns Framework derived from the Common Sense Model (CSM) of Self-Regulation guided the interpretation of themes. Results: In this diverse sample (39% Black, 6% Hispanic, 63% male; mean age 59 15 years), 90% reported at least intermittent nonadherence. For many (60%), missing medication was unintentional but 27% reported intentional nonadherence. Four interconnected patterns of behavior emerged: 1) rarely non adherent, 2) frequently nonadherent, 3) intentionally nonadherent, and 4) reformed nonadherent. Misperceptions about HF, beliefs, concerns, and contextual factors contributed to both intentional and unintentional nonadherence. Conclusion: Medication nonadherence is prevalent in HF and influenced by modifiable factors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available