4.3 Article

Technology Recommendations to Support Person-Centered Care in Long-Term Care Homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY
Volume 33, Issue 4-5, Pages 539-554

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2021.1927620

Keywords

Technology; infrastructure; long-term care; nursing homes; care homes; person-centered care; ageism; digital exclusion

Categories

Funding

  1. Alzheimer Society of Canada New Investigator Award
  2. Alzheimer Society Research Program
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted disparities in the long-term care sector, emphasizing the need to update technological infrastructure to support residents' connections with loved ones.
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed persistent inequities in the long-term care sector and brought strict social/physical distancing distancing and public health quarantine guidelines that inadvertently put long-term care residents at risk for social isolation and loneliness. Virtual communication and technologies have come to the forefront as the primary mode for residents to maintain connections with their loved ones and the outside world; yet, many long-term care homes do not have the technological capabilities to support modern day technologies. There is an urgent need to replace antiquated technological infrastructures to enable person-centered care and prevent potentially irreversible cognitive and psychological declines by ensuring residents are able to maintain important relationships with their family and friends. To this end, we provide five technological recommendations to support the ethos of person-centered care in residential long-term care homes during the pandemic and in a post-COVID-19 pandemic world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available