4.5 Article

Gender differences in appraisal of stress and coping 5 years after heart transplantation

Journal

HEART & LUNG
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 41-47

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.09.009

Keywords

Stress and coping; Heart transplant; Gender; Symptoms; Perceived adherence; Social support

Funding

  1. National Institute of Nursing Research [R01 NR005200]
  2. College of Nursing, Rush University
  3. Rush Heart Institute, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
  4. Northwestern University, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We examined whether gender differences exist regarding stress, symptom distress, coping, adherence, and social support 5 years after heart transplantation. Background: Differences exist in health-related quality of life outcomes by gender after heart transplantation; women report poorer outcomes. Methods: Patients (n = 210, female = 42), were from a prospective, multi-site, study of health-related quality of life long-term after heart transplantation. Patients completed self-report instruments 5 years after heart transplantation (mean = 4.98 +/- 0.17 years after transplant). Statistical analyses included two-sample t-tests, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and multivariable modeling. Results: Women did not report more overall stress or symptom distress, but reported more difficulty adhering to the transplant regimen, yet more actual adherence than men. Women reported using more negative coping styles, but reported more satisfaction with social support. Conclusions: Gender differences exist regarding appraisal of stress, coping styles, and coping resources long-term after heart transplantation. These differences may guide tailoring therapy regarding stress, poor coping, and lack of resources. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available