Journal
JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 62-70Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000788
Keywords
lung cancer; lung nodule; likelihood ratio; Bayes' theorem; ROC curve; solitary pulmonary nodule
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Likelihood ratios are a method to evaluate diagnostic test performance. This paper reviews the concept of likelihood ratios and provides practical examples of their application in calculating posttest disease probabilities.
Likelihood ratios (LRs) are a method to evaluate diagnostic test performance and assist in clinical decision making. While sensitivity and specificity are useful for binary tests, they cannot be directly applied to tests with >2 possible test results. LRs can be used for diagnostic tests with 2 or more possible test results and are also suitable for tests with continuous results. In this paper we review the concepts of LRs and how they relate to sensitivity and specificity. Practical examples from the pulmonary literature of how LRs are used to calculate posttest disease probabilities using Bayes' theorem are provided. These include examples when there are 3 or more categorical test results that have distinct interpretations (eg, cytology results from endobronchial ultrasound) as well as continuous test results (eg, computed tomography lymph node size and probability of metastasis). We also highlight some problems, pitfalls, and misunderstandings about LRs in clinical practice. We use the example of how the Nodify XL2 test incorrectly calculates and applies LRs, which may lead to falsely low estimates of the probability of cancer in some pulmonary nodules.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available