Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation

Lung volume recruitment manoeuvres are often prescribed to maintain respiratory health in neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, no current system accurately records delivered dose. This study determined the performance characteristics of a novel, objective, manual lung volume recruitment bag counter ('the counter') with bench and healthy volunteer testing, as well as in individuals with neuromuscular disease. We undertook (1) bench test determination of activation threshold, (2) bench and healthy volunteer fidelity testing during simulated patient interface leak and different pressure compressions and (3) comparisons with self-report in individuals with neuromuscular disease. The data are reported as summary statistics, compression counts, percentage of recorded versus delivered compressions and concordance (Cohen's kappa (K) and absolute agreement). Results Minimum counter activation pressure under conditions of zero leak was 1.9 +/- 0.4 cm H2O. No difference was observed between the number of repetitions delivered and recorded during high airway pressure condition. Interface leak approximating 25% resulted in underestimation of repetition counts, and once the leak was at 50% or beyond, the counter recorded no activity. Faster sampling frequency collected data with more fidelity. Counter data agreed with diary self-report during community trials (16 participants, 960 participant days, 77% agreement, Cohen's Kappa=0.66 and p<0.001). Disagreement typically favoured more diary reported (18%) than counter (5%) sessions. Conclusions The performance characteristics of a new lung volume recruitment counter have been established in both laboratory and community settings. Objective usage and dosage data should accelerate new knowledge development and better translation of lung volume recruitment therapy into policy and practice.

Automated summary

A new lung volume recruitment counter was tested in both laboratory and community settings, with the minimum activation pressure under zero leak conditions being 1.9cmH2O. Interface leak led to underestimation of repetition counts, and faster sampling frequency improved data fidelity. Counter data agreed with diary self-report during community trials, but discrepancies tended to favor diary-reported sessions over counter-recorded sessions.