4.2 Article

Fostering collaborative approaches to gender equality interventions in higher education and research: the case of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENDER STUDIES
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 36-54

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2021.1935804

Keywords

Communities of practice; gender equality initiatives; gender equality plans; higher education; research and innovation; collaborative approaches; institutional change

Funding

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [788204]
  2. ACT on Gender project consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights the issues of wasting female talent and gender inequality in higher education and research in Europe. The European Commission recommends adopting gender equality plans and other mechanisms, but the levels of readiness and experience vary across institutions and member states. Collaborative approaches, particularly using the CoP method, can support change agents in promoting gender equality initiatives.
Higher education and research and innovation in Europe continue to suffer from an indefensible waste of female talent and gender inequality. The European Commission recommends that these organizations adopt gender equality plans (GEPs) and other initiatives for institutional change. However, the levels of readiness, expertise, and experience with such interventions are wide-ranging across institutions and member states, thus collaborative approaches might be particularly valuable. Drawing on the experiences of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice (CoPs) for gender equality (GE), we illuminate how the CoP approach supported change agents, who leveraged CoP membership to respond to challenges in promoting GE initiatives. Being part of collaborative, co-designed CoPs for learning, knowledge sharing, and institutional change provided external support to the change agents' activism and allowed them to build legitimacy around GE work. CoP members leveraged this support through learning opportunities, knowledge transfer, sharing practice, political support, and solidarity from the CoP stakeholders. Findings also show that when CoPs were transnational, multi-institutional, and interdisciplinary, their heterogeneity did raise some challenges in relation to the divergence of members' contexts and geopolitical idiosyncrasies and that this should be considered when designing CoPs which transcend national and institutional boundaries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available