3.9 Article

A novel multiple objective whale optimization for time-cost-quality tradeoff in non-unit repetitive projects

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 843-854

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1938939

Keywords

Time-cost-quality tradeoffs; construction management; multiple objective; repetitive project; whale optimization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Project managers aim to complete projects with the shortest time, lowest cost, and highest quality. This study proposes a free-parameter multiple objective optimization method to tradeoff time, cost, and quality in non-unit repetitive projects.
Project managers are the ones who struggle to complete the project with the shortest possible time, the least amount of costs and, the highest quality. The primary objective in the planning stage of the project management process is to identify the most suitable schedule from provided time-cost-quality curve. Scheduling of construction repetitive projects assumes the same production and hard logic between units. This study proposes a free-parameter multiple objective whale optimization (MOWO) to tradeoff the time, cost and, quality factors in non-unit repetitive projects (NRP). An external scheduling system shall consider project activities dependencies, multiple crew assignments, and soft logic in units to calculate project duration, cost and, quality. A construction case study was used to examine MOWO performance. Furthermore, some broadly recognized multiple objective evolutionary algorithms are employed to compare with the proposed algorithm. Result comparison points out that MOWO attained the best optimization outcomes in handling the time-cost-quality tradeoff in non-unit repetitive construction projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available