4.0 Article

Spatial patterns of urbanisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Uganda

Journal

DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 1-21

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2021.1932426

Keywords

Sustainable urbanisation; rank-size analysis; secondary towns; Sub-Saharan Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sub-Saharan Africa is experiencing rapid urbanization, but this process is not always sustainable. Few studies have examined the importance of secondary towns in this urbanization process. By analyzing the population growth patterns in Uganda, it is found that secondary towns with over 50,000 inhabitants have the highest population growth rates, suggesting the need for investments in their socio-economic infrastructure.
Sub-Saharan Africa is rapidly urbanising. This urbanisation may contribute to socio-economic development as more people participate in the urban economy. Nevertheless, rapid urbanisation is not always sustainable. Primary cities often grow fast, leaving secondary towns lagging behind with weaker economies. Viable strategies for sustainable urbanisation may therefore also need to focus on developing secondary towns. Nevertheless, very few studies, hitherto, have assessed the (relative) importance of secondary towns in urbanisation process in Sub-Saharan Africa. We aim to address this gap by studying the patterns and explanatory factors of urban population growth in Uganda. Based on a longitudinal analysis of population rank-size distribution, we show that the population distribution gap between secondary towns and the primary city is widening. Nevertheless, statistical analyses further indicate that secondary towns with above 50 000 inhabitants have the highest population growth rates. This indicates that future investments should aim at upgrading socio-economic infrastructures in secondary towns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available