4.4 Article

Lactation Support Services and Breastfeeding Initiation: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 2175-2196

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12598

Keywords

Breastfeeding; Affordable Care Act

Funding

  1. MCH Research Program, from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services [R40MC28305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveDespite substantial evidence of the benefits of breastfeeding for both mothers and children, rates of sustained breastfeeding in the United States are quite low. This study examined whether mandated coverage of lactation support services under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) affects breastfeeding behavior. Data SourceWe studied the census of U.S. births included in the National Vital Statistics System from 2009 to 2014. Study DesignWe used regression-adjusted difference-in-differences (DD) to examine changes in breastfeeding rates for privately insured mothers relative to those covered by Medicaid. We adjusted for several health and sociodemographic measures. We also examined the extent to which the effect varied across vulnerable populationsby race/ethnicity, maternal education, WIC status, and mode of delivery. Principal FindingsResults suggest that the ACA mandate increased the probability of breastfeeding initiation by 2.5 percentage points, which translates into about 47,000 more infants for whom breastfeeding was initiated in 2014. We find larger effects for black, less educated, and unmarried mothers. ConclusionsThe Affordable Care Act-mandated coverage of lactation services increased breastfeeding initiation among privately insured mothers relative to mothers covered by Medicaid. The magnitude of the effect size varied with some evidence of certain groups being more likely to increase breastfeeding rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available