Journal
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 1445-1472Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12537
Keywords
Heart failure; hospital readmission; home health care; transitional care; instrumental variable
Funding
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R01HS020257]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective. To compare the effectiveness of two treatments-early, intensive home health nursing and physician follow-up within a week-versus less intense and later postacute care in reducing readmissions among heart failure (HF) patients discharged to home health care. Data Sources. National Medicare administrative, claims, and patient assessment data. Study Design. Patients with a full week of potential exposure to the treatments were followed for 30 days to determine exposure status, 30-day all-cause hospital readmission, other health care use, and mortality. An extension of instrumental variables methods for nonlinear statistical models corrects for nonrandom selection of patients into treatment categories. Our instruments are the index hospital's rate of early aftercare for non-HF patients and hospital discharge day of the week. Data Extraction Methods. All hospitalizations for a HF principal diagnosis with discharge to home health care between July 2009 and June 2010 were identified from source files. Principal Findings. Neither treatment by itself has a statistically significant effect on hospital readmission. In combination, however, they reduce the probability of readmission by roughly 8 percentage points (p<.001; confidence interval = -12.3, -4.1). Results are robust to changes in implementation of the nonlinear IV estimator, sample, outcome measure, and length of follow-up. Conclusions. Our results call for closer coordination between home health and medical providers in the clinical management of HF patients immediately after hospital discharge.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available