4.5 Article

Collaborative innovation efficiency: From within cities to between cities-Empirical analysis based on innovative cities in China

Journal

GROWTH AND CHANGE
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 1330-1360

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/grow.12504

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Major program of the Chinese National Social Science Foundation [18ZDA040]
  2. Youth project of Liaoning social science planning fund [L20CJL001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2124002-02]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC) Project [202006270227]
  5. Research start-up funds of Northeastern University [02050016201114]
  6. Ministry of Education Humanities and social sciences research planning fund project [20YJA790010]
  7. General program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [42071154]
  8. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680960]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study finds that collaborative innovation efficiency within cities in China is increasing, with the efficiency of research to production significantly higher than that of learning to research. Industrial structure and external factors have hindered efficiency improvements, while infrastructure and living standards have different effects on efficiency at different stages.
The city is both a carrier and a subject of innovation. Based on the triple helix theory of industry-university research and the theory of spatial correlation, this study constructs a collaborative innovation framework both within the cities and between cities, and uses a network data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and spatial econometric model to measure and analyze the collaborative innovation efficiency in 75 innovative cities in China. The results show that collaborative innovation efficiency within cities is on the rise, and the efficiency of research to production is significantly higher than that of learning to research. Industrial structure and foreign factors have inhibited the efficiency improvements, and infrastructure and living standards have different promoting effects on different stages of efficiency. Between cities, capital flows have obvious spillover effects, which promote the efficiency of innovation networks, while the long-term characteristics of institutional learning have a near-term negative impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available