4.3 Article

Risk-Averse Two-Stage Stochastic Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Asymmetric Adjustment Cost

Journal

GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 261-291

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-021-09752-z

Keywords

Two-stage mean-risk stochastic programming; Minimum cost consensus model; Directional constraints; L-shaped algorithm

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [17BGL083]
  2. Philosophy and Social Science of Shanghai [2020BGL010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the process of reaching consensus, uncertain factors impact group decision-making, with new models considering both risk and cost, and achieving optimal solutions through the L-shaped algorithm, showing high accuracy and efficiency.
In the process of reaching consensus, it is necessary to coordinate different views to form a general group opinion. However, there are many uncertain factors in this process, which has brought different degrees of influence in group decision-making. Besides, these uncertain elements bring the risk of loss to the whole process of consensus building. Currently available models not account for these two aspects. To deal with these issues, three different modeling methods for constructing the two-stage mean-risk stochastic minimum cost consensus models (MCCMs) with asymmetric adjustment cost are investigated. Due to the complexity of the resulting models, the L-shaped algorithm is applied to achieve an optimal solution. In addition, a numerical example of a peer-to-peer online lending platform demonstrated the utility of the proposed modeling approach. To verify the result obtained by the L-shaped algorithm, it is compared with the CPLEX solver. Moreover, the comparison results show the accuracy and efficiency of the given method. Sensitivity analyses are undertaken to assess the impact of risk on results. And in the presence of asymmetric cost, the comparisons between the new proposed risk-averse MCCMs and the two-stage stochastic MCCMs and robust consensus models are also given.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available