4.0 Article

A case of isolated sinus bradycardia as an unusual presentation of adrenal insufficiency

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102727

Keywords

Bradycardia; Adrenal insufficiency; Pacemaker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case study presents a patient with symptomatic sinus bradycardia resulting in syncope, later found to have underlying adrenal insufficiency that was treated with steroids. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and correcting the underlying causes of symptomatic bradycardia.
Introduction: Sinus bradycardia is a common entity encountered in clinical practice. The differential diagnosis is quite broad; it can be an incidental finding in otherwise healthy adults or the first clue to a lethal pathology. Case presentation: This case highlights a patient who presented with symptomatic sinus bradycardia, which resulted in syncope requiring admission for permanent pacemaker implantation and later found to have an underlying adrenal insufficiency (AI). Patient's underlying hyponatremia was corrected but bradycardia per -sisted and after the initiation of steroids, bradycardia resolved. Therefore, the likely culprit for bradycardia was AI. Discussion: Multiple disease processes that manifest with sinus bradycardia are commonly due to the increased vagal tone or the presence of intrinsic conduction disorders. Sinus bradycardia is a common clinical finding with a broad differential including intrinsic and extrinsic causes of sinus node dysfunction or AV block. Conclusion: It is imperative for clinicians to be aware of rare etiologies for underlying symptomatic bradycardia. While extremely effective at preventing symptomatic bradycardia, avoiding a pacemaker by correcting the un-derlying etiology of symptomatic bradycardia may improve quality of life and avoid an unnecessary procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available