4.4 Article

Economic impact of 2015 transboundary haze on Singapore

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101329

Keywords

Haze; Air pollution; Tangible costs; Intangible costs; Cost-benefit analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Singapore's Ministry of Education AcRF Tier 1 [RG148/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the economic impact of transboundary haze pollution in 2015 on Singapore, including both tangible and intangible costs. The total cost of the haze episode was estimated at S$1.83 billion, with important implications for public policy.
We quantify and estimate the economic impact of the transboundary haze pollution in 2015 on Singapore following reliable quantitative methods and techniques in cost-benefit analysis. We include in the estimation both tangible and intangible costs associated to haze pollution. Specifically, in the estimation of the tangible costs of haze, the estimation includes (1) adverse impacts of haze on health, (2) loss in tourism, (3) loss in business as an indirect effect from loss of tourist receipts, (4) productivity loss due to restricted activity days and (5) cost of mitigation and adaptation by government agencies and households. For the estimation of the intangible costs, the value is derived from the contingent valuation study of Quah et al., 2018 which was conducted in 2018 to estimate Singapore residents' willingness to pay for a pro-environment collaboration project that could effectively stop slash and burn practices and significantly reduce the annual haze pollution issue. The total cost of the 2015 haze episode on Singapore which lasted for 2 months is estimated at S $1.83 billion, amounting to 0.45 % of the country's gross domestic product. Accordingly, the total tangible cost is estimated at S$1.46 billion equivalent to 0.36 % of GDP while the total intangible cost stands at S$0.36 billion equivalent to 0.09 % of GDP. The findings have important implications for public policy. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available