4.1 Article

Grain boundary energy function for α iron

Journal

MATERIALIA
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101186

Keywords

Grain boundary energy; Misorientation; Atomistic simulations; BCC metals

Funding

  1. Research Strengthening Project of the Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT)
  2. Thailand Research Fund
  3. Office of the Higher Education Commission [MRG6080253]
  4. Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT)
  5. Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talents Project (DPST)
  6. National Science Foundation [DMREF-1628994]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a piece-wise continuous grain boundary energy function was constructed for polycrystalline alpha iron to fill the entire five-dimensional space of grain boundary types. The results suggest that grain boundary engineering in alpha iron should consider high-energy anisotropy misorientations, rather than twin-related grain boundaries as in the case of fcc metals.
Polycrystalline alpha iron has been used in various applications, yet its microstructure design via grain boundary engineering (GBE) is not well established. One limiting factor is that while there are many different grain boundaries in the five-dimensional space of grain boundary types, relatively few of the energies have been determined. In this study, a piece-wise continuous grain boundary energy function for alpha iron is constructed to fill the entire five-dimensional space of grain boundary types using scaffolding subsets with lower dimensionality. Because the energies interpolated from the grain boundary energy function are consistent with the 408 boundaries that have been calculated using atomistic simulations, the energy function is then employed to generate a larger set of grain boundary energies. Comparisons between the interpolated energies and the measured grain boundary population indicate that they are inversely correlated for the high-energy anisotropy misorientations (those for which the difference between the maximum and minimum grain boundary energies is greater than 0.4 J/m(2)). The results suggest that GBE in the alpha iron should consider the high-energy anisotropy misorientations, rather than the twinning-related grain boundaries (Sigma 3, Sigma 9, Sigma 27a, and Sigma 27b) as in the case of fcc metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available