Journal
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 71-96Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-021-09480-z
Keywords
Evaluation; Megan's Law; Meta-analysis; Sex Offender Registry and Notification; SORN; RSOs
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that 25 years of Sex Offender Registration and Notification (SORN) evaluations have no significant impact on recidivism. Whether analyzing a combined model or disaggregating by sexual or non-sexual offenses, arrest or conviction, there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of SORN policies in reducing recidivism.
Objectives Examine 25 years of Sex Offender Registration and Notification (SORN) evaluations and their effects on recidivism. Methods We rely on methodology guidelines established by the Campbell Collaboration for meta-analyses to systematically synthesize results from 18 research articles including 474,640 formerly incarcerated individuals. We estimate the effect of SORN policies on recidivism from 42 effect sizes and determine if the effect of SORN varies by sexual or non-sexual recidivism when examining arrest or conviction as outcomes. Results The random-effects meta-analysis model demonstrated that SORN does not have a statistically significant impact on recidivism. This null effect exists when examining a combined model and when disaggregating studies by sexual or non-sexual offenses, or conceptualizing recidivism by arrest or conviction. Conclusions SORN policies demonstrate no effect on recidivism. This finding holds important policy implications given the extensive adoption and net-widening of penalties related to SORN.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available